🔗 Share this article

In a unattributed decision, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted Texas to use a redrawn congressional district plan that is projected to include up to five new Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three decision, issued on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to lift a district court's ruling that had rejected the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Reasoning

The federal judge improperly inserted itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating significant confusion and disrupting the fine federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in detailing its ruling.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had likely sorted voters according to their race – a act known as racial gerrymandering – when it passed the redistricting plan. It had ordered the state to revert to the districts created after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

Through a sharply worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's decision. She argued that it disregarded the work of the lower court, observing that its decision was actually authored by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan stated in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its boosted favoritism, will dictate next year's elections. And it means that many Texas citizens, unjustly, will be sorted in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a breach of the law of the land.

National Map-Drawing Fight

This decision is part of a nationwide contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in pushes to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican majority. Usually, boundary revision occurs after a decennial population count. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a series of events among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that are estimated to yield several more GOP-friendly seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have countered with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Political Reactions

Lone Star State attorney general hailed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's prerogative to draw a map that guarantees representation supportive of Republicans. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he stated.

Conversely, opposition party officials lamented the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the chair of a major party election organization.

Another leading Democratic figure said the court had once again damaged its legitimacy by approving a racially gerrymandered map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.